/Resources 328 0 R /S /L << /S /P /MarkInfo 2 0 R 198 0 obj >> /Type /Page 0000051645 00000 n uuid:39348FAF-56C1-45B6-9267-1F93B3F12615uuid:39348FAF-56C1-45B6-9267-1F93B3F12615 0000005141 00000 n 225 0 R 226 0 R 227 0 R 228 0 R 229 0 R 230 0 R 231 0 R 232 0 R 233 0 R] 45 0 obj /P 476 0 R /Pg 29 0 R /Annots [] /Type /Page /Annotation /Sect /P 10 0 R 0000001255 00000 n /S /P endobj >> /Type /StructElem endobj /Type /Catalog 182 0 obj If an interrogatory seeks information that is not within the personal knowledge of the responding party, that party must provide any information that it has and the source on which the information is based. Fla. R. Civ. 218 0 obj endobj endobj /Pg 34 0 R /Pg 31 0 R 303.1: Objection. 268 0 obj The scope of inquiry allowable in interrogatories is any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter of the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or the claim or defense of any other party, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any books, documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter. Fla. R. Civ. /Type /StructElem /K [4] >> << /Size 113 /Prev 323787 /K [8] /P 473 0 R /K [2] 86 0 R 87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R /P 10 0 R /S /P /K [3] 0000004919 00000 n OBJECTIONS. /P 466 0 R /P 10 0 R 270 0 obj /K [36] /Type /StructElem 46 0 R 47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R /Type /StructElem 0000000994 00000 n /K [1] >> /Type /StructElem << 81 0 obj endobj 158 0 obj /S /P /A 467 0 R /K [0] >> %PDF-1.4 Interrogatories can be served on a plaintiff any time after the action is commenced. /P 10 0 R 133 0 obj << /P 450 0 R << /Linearized 1 /L 325360 /H [ 1696 230 ] /O 75 /E 232069 /N 2 /T 323796 >> Answers made by a party are not binding on a co-party. >> >> /K [4] /P 441 0 R << >> Use this At A Glance Guide to learn the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure related to responding to interrogatoriesin Florida Circuit Courts. /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /K [0] /Contents [405 0 R 406 0 R 407 0 R] << endobj /P 473 0 R /Pg 18 0 R >> #"4H$ _p \BE69 $"*C^_r wI='o*A01o%A%2x^18!3]=$x:0/"vKbUe|^b8E1#S D Gf^>#z_BF\T *DFhQ H$R!UsF%'X['Rad+I7b*:iYtd8I^\}=q&>LE4. /Tabs /S /S /P >> >> District of Florida, copies of written interrogatories, answers and objections to interrogatories, notices of oral depositions, transcripts of oral depositions, requests for the production of documents and other things, responses to requests for production, matters disclosed pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1), Federal Rules of Civil << /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /P 473 0 R >> 113 0 obj 263 0 obj /Type /StructElem << >> /K [34] /S /P /Pg 18 0 R /Tabs /S /Group 369 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /StructParents 21 /K [2] << << >> /K [0] %PDF-1.6 % <>/Metadata 14 0 R/OutputIntents[<>]/Pages 8 0 R/StructTreeRoot 16 0 R/Type/Catalog/Names 71 0 R>> /S /P /K [4] /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /S /P /Creator /K [0] >> /S /P /P 10 0 R << /K [7] /Type /Metadata endobj 98 0 obj /Pg 28 0 R /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Type /StructElem /K [3] << /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /K [1] 254 0 obj 290 0 obj 114 0 obj >> /S /P /Group 419 0 R /Pg 31 0 R 105 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R This Note addresses the duty to search for responsive information, who must respond to interrogatories, the types of responses that the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure permit, and the service and filing requirements for interrogatories. In litigation, written discovery typically consists of (1) Requests for Production, (2) Requests for Admission, and (3) Interrogatories. /P 458 0 R /Pg 26 0 R H|= /S /P << /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem << Timothy J. Corrigan, Chief United States District Judge Elizabeth Warren, Clerk of Court. << This Note also explains how to draft the response, including the answers or objections to specific interrogatories, and how a party may elect to produce documents in response to an interrogatory. << 0000000016 00000 n /Type /StructElem endobj 238 0 obj /S /P /Type /StructElem 80 0 obj /S /P /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem >> << /K [1] >> /S /P 6 and Document Request No. << << /Pg 16 0 R endobj /K [9] /Pg 34 0 R 208 0 obj /P 10 0 R 0000000914 00000 n /StructParents 0 endobj /Pg 34 0 R /Chart /Sect 234 0 obj /P 10 0 R 6 0 obj /Type /Page >> endobj /Pg 32 0 R << /Type /StructElem >> hb```\@( \0Y;9}z DKm[+\L9^00dt40ht00z i^$H@2z2ftdfge( ??wi]6NL ]s00^2J ] /K [4] startxref /Type /StructElem /S /P /Nums [0 [234 0 R 235 0 R 236 0 R 237 0 R 238 0 R 239 0 R 240 0 R 241 0 R 242 0 R 243 0 R /ParentTreeNextKey 25 << Interrogatories that generally require the responding party to state the basis of particular claims, defenses, or contentions in pleadings or other documents should be used sparingly and, if used, should be designed (1) to target claims, defenses, or contentions that the propounding attorney reasonably suspects may be the proper subject of early /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem A Practice Note discussing how to draft and serve a response to interrogatories in a Florida circuit court civil case. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm. /S /P /S /P 16 0 obj endobj /K [15] endobj >> /Pg 15 0 R /Type /StructElem P. 1.280(e). endobj >> 24 0 obj << /P 10 0 R 36 0 obj /S /P 0000004654 00000 n 0000002146 00000 n 267 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R << /Pg 16 0 R /StructParents 9 /S /P /Type /StructElem Some plaintiff attorneys have adapted to the Nucci decision and now argue that, at most, the opinion only permits discovery identical to that discussed in Nuccisocial media photographs preceding a date of loss by no more than two years. 151 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R 121 0 obj 298 0 obj The interrogatory also seeks attorney work-product in violation of Code of Civil Procedure sections 2018.020 and 2018.030. /Pg 13 0 R endobj 296 0 obj /Contents [390 0 R 391 0 R 392 0 R] >> /StructParents 14 Each defendant's responses to these requests are essentially identical, with the exception of Interrogatory No. >> << /P 10 0 R Aninterrogatory is not objectionable becausean answer to it involves an opinion or con-tention that relates to fact or the applica-tion of law to fact, or would be based oninformation obtained or legal theories de-veloped in anticipation of litigation or inpreparation of trial." 17 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] 5 0 obj 27 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Worksheet /Part /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /P 472 0 R << << >> 55 0 obj /S /P /S /P /K [9] /Pg 17 0 R /S /P << >> /Type /StructElem << /S /P /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /Tabs /S 82 0 R 83 0 R 84 0 R 85 0 R] /P 10 0 R These "general objections" generally include claims that the discovery requests are: 1) overbroad; 2) burdensome; 3) not relevant nor likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; 4) not appropriately limited in time; 5) seek information protected by the attorney client and/or work product privilege; and 6) not limited to products or issues which are substantially similar to the . /S /P >> /S /P /Pg 30 0 R /Type /StructElem 0000008012 00000 n /Contents [355 0 R 356 0 R 357 0 R] << 147 0 obj /P 10 0 R /K [23] endobj endobj Specific objections should be matched to specific requests. >> /K [1] litany of objections, discussed below. 227 0 obj /P 10 0 R << /P 10 0 R 18 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R /Type /StructElem endstream << 0000005508 00000 n /Pg 13 0 R endobj 10 [126 0 R 127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R] Interrogatories requests that the responding party answer the questions under oath. /S /P endobj /P 472 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 25 0 R >> endobj << Hp@eR $&=bR@\e qo#g p), Prior to the plaintiffs deposition, defense counsel saw that her Facebook profile contained 1,285 photographs. /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem 58 0 obj endobj 292 0 obj /P 472 0 R /P 468 0 R /P 10 0 R /Parent 6 0 R >> >> /S /P 0000230525 00000 n /P 473 0 R >> endobj endobj /Type /StructElem Cal. P. 1.340(a). 0000051906 00000 n /P 10 0 R 53 0 obj 155 0 R 156 0 R 157 0 R 158 0 R 159 0 R 160 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R 163 0 R 164 0 R endobj /P 478 0 R /Pg 20 0 R 249 0 obj /S /P endobj /Pg 22 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /S /P 132 0 obj 179 0 obj /P 10 0 R << /Type /StructElem /K [1] /Type /StructElem Blanket, unsupported objections that a discovery endobj /Type /StructElem /K [4] /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Pg 14 0 R /P 475 0 R 253 0 obj /K [9] /Artifact /Sect /P 472 0 R 306 0 obj >> /K [0] endobj >> Interrogatories are a formal set of written questions propounded by one party upon another party. /P 444 0 R /K [14] /P 476 0 R /S /P 181 0 obj endobj >> 1 0 obj >> /S /P >> /Type /StructElem endobj /S /LBody /S /L << (For an example, see our sample interrogatory and answer number 14, below.) >> >> endobj 66 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R & endobj endobj /K [5] /S /P /S /P /StructParents 12 /P 471 0 R >> << /Type /StructElem /S /L 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R /S /P << >> 289 0 obj endobj /Pg 15 0 R 72 0 obj In 1994, the Trial Lawyers Section of The Florida Bar, the Conference of Circuit Judges, and the Conference of County Court Judges formed a joint committee to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas on how to improve the day- to-day practice of law for trial lawyers and trial judges. (Do not identify anyone who simply typed or reproduced the responses.) /S /P endobj << >> 138 0 obj %PDF-1.6 % /S /P In a thorough opinion that cited to and adopted reasoning from courts across the country, the Fourth District denied the plaintiffs petition for certiorari and upheld the trial courts order. 135 0 obj /S /P /S /P /StructParents 10 8 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R /Parent 6 0 R /P 474 0 R 111 0 obj endobj /S /P CCP, which can be used in other jurisdictions as well. /Pg 32 0 R This Standard Document has integrated notes with important explanations on how to draft common interrogatories used in Florida litigation and the usual defined terms and instructions. /P 10 0 R 51 0 obj >> << It is duplicative of Form Interrogatory 3.1 which was served by Madera Framing on November 24, 2015 and responded to on January 15, 2016, by Responding Party. /S /P /Contents [330 0 R 331 0 R 332 0 R] /Type /Page 120 0 obj endobj Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select, Practical Law Standard Document w-032-8526, https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/Ifc45d63a22db11ecbea4f0dc9fb69570/Interrogatories-FL?viewType=FullText&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default). /K [3] >> /Type /StructElem /K [22] >> >> endobj /K [32] >> /P 472 0 R << /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R endobj /P 10 0 R >> /Pg 17 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 29 0 R 174 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Pg 27 0 R << Note that if an interrogatory asks for improper information and you fail to object, the court might treat your objection as "waived," or surrendered. /Contents [395 0 R 396 0 R 397 0 R] << endobj /Resources 373 0 R endobj << /Pg 27 0 R .*fgg!hL_F"$TXdV2=<8\2h? >> /S /P 0000014306 00000 n 40 0 obj /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R 16 [178 0 R 179 0 R 180 0 R 181 0 R 292 0 R 183 0 R 184 0 R 185 0 R 186 0 R 187 0 R Arguments that a court should allow relevant and reasonably calculated photographs originating from a social media account, but not, say, text-based writings, are not only logically inconsistent with Nucci, but they are also internally inconsistent with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(1), which allows [d]iscovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter of the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or the claim or defense of any other party.. 0000051133 00000 n /P 473 0 R /Resources 433 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 13 0 R << /Type /StructElem 168 0 obj /P 10 0 R /Pg 24 0 R 279 0 obj endobj 282 0 obj >> >> >> endobj << /S /P /S /P /P 10 0 R >> endobj /Type /StructElem endobj /K [8] /S /P /Pg 34 0 R /K [14] << /Type /Page /K [10] 165 0 obj /P 10 0 R /P 443 0 R >> 264 0 obj 205 0 R 206 0 R 207 0 R 208 0 R 209 0 R 210 0 R 211 0 R 212 0 R 213 0 R 214 0 R 2 [44 0 R 45 0 R 283 0 R 47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R 0000004751 00000 n /K [482 0 R 317 0 R] /Annots [] << >> 0000052748 00000 n 73 0 obj endobj /K [0] << 92 0 obj M i c r o s o f t W o r d 2 0 1 6; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT /Pg 27 0 R 300 0 obj /K [0] 76 0 obj /S /P endobj l+-M2hPm c/n` lM# 4 0 obj /K [8] /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem 101 0 obj >> >> /Type /StructElem trailer << endobj 222 0 obj /S /P << /K [5] /A 439 0 R /K [21] /Type /Page /Tabs /S 0000003211 00000 n 323 0 obj /S /Span /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 30 0 R /P 10 0 R Ten interrogatories, including subparts, may be sent to a party, in addition to the standard interrogatories contained in Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.930 (b) or Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.930 (c). /K [8] /P 474 0 R << 209 0 obj 20 [215 0 R 216 0 R 293 0 R 218 0 R 219 0 R] /K [6] /P 451 0 R /Pg 13 0 R >> P~N1elO( /P 474 0 R /Type /StructElem Fla. R. Civ. 164 0 obj << /Type /StructElem /ABCpdf 8123 , requires the respondent to answer an interrogatory separately and fully in writing and under oath, unless the respondent objects, in which event the party objecting shall state with specificity the reasons for objection and shall answer to the extent the interrogatory is not objectionable. /P 472 0 R A party may propound to another party thirty (30) interrogatories, including those from the official forms or custom drafted ones. /P 10 0 R 159 0 obj endobj >> 0000001696 00000 n /S /P /S /P /Pg 31 0 R >> /P 10 0 R 3 [54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R /Pg 34 0 R endobj 2023 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C. /K [25] /Pg 19 0 R /Pg 34 0 R >> /Pg 19 0 R 0000007296 00000 n /S /P << << /Pg 18 0 R 194 0 obj 0000052510 00000 n /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Pg 33 0 R >> /Type /StructElem endobj endobj /P 10 0 R 26 0 obj endobj /K [22] /Type /StructElem /Annots [] /K [6] /K [35] /Marked true << /Type /Page /S /P /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /Link /Pg 34 0 R /K [26] /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /Annots [] /K [0] >> 185 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R /Type /StructElem >> /Type /StructElem <> << /Type /StructElem /S /P /Type /StructElem /K [454 0 R] endobj /Type /StructElem endobj /Type /StructElem >> Defense attorneys can expect objections to any social media-related discovery requests that exceed those contemplated by the Nucci court. /K [4] 14 [154 0 R 155 0 R 156 0 R 157 0 R 158 0 R 159 0 R 290 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R 163 0 R endobj >> /Annots [] endobj >> /Pg 17 0 R << /K [6] /A 457 0 R endobj /P 10 0 R /Tabs /S /Pg 25 0 R endobj 0 304 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Type /Page /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem 156 0 obj /Contents [365 0 R 366 0 R 367 0 R] /P 472 0 R /K [18] /Type /StructElem >> endobj /K [4] endobj >> << << /S /P /P 10 0 R << 311 0 obj << << >> << 297 0 obj /S /P Specific Objections All objections to discovery requests must be specific. /K [9] 25 0 obj /S /P 2000 Market Street, Suite 2300 /K [10] /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /S /LBody /Pg 25 0 R /Annots [] << /S /P xref /K [0] endobj /Type /StructElem >> /S /P /S /P endobj /K [2] /K [1] wm%&8=3mM1S7v1mgM1Za.arN'6{)w]Na~c=vwgJV p.EjnM]Q}1r{ytlx)N^F;:X"5c+\CiKc\J*J6cER(b:DaTvFMU /Type /StructElem 217 0 obj >> >> >> /Type /StructElem /K [2] /Pg 20 0 R /K [3] /P 10 0 R >> 157 0 obj /K [7] /K [3] /K [8] /S /P /Annots [] /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R >> /P 477 0 R /K [12] 99 0 obj /K [0] /Tabs /S Importantly, the Fourth District only contemplated still images in Nucci because they were the subject of the discovery dispute. /Group 389 0 R endobj << >> << 0000175500 00000 n >> I graduated with a bachelor of science . << /Type /StructElem >> /P 10 0 R endobj >> endobj % Form 2 - GENERAL PERSONAL INJURY NEGLIGENCE - INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT. << 18 [202 0 R 203 0 R 204 0 R 205 0 R 206 0 R 207 0 R 208 0 R 209 0 R 210 0 R 211 0 R] /S /Link >> endobj >> /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R >> /K [6] /Pg 34 0 R P. 1.340(b). /Contents [415 0 R 416 0 R 417 0 R] /K [5] xref 83 0 obj /K [7] 188 0 R 189 0 R 190 0 R 191 0 R] << endobj /Type /StructElem /K [36] /Type /StructElem /Length 12 0 R endobj /Pg 13 0 R /K [37] /Type /Pages /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] 56 0 obj Form 4 - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT. endobj /K [5] 13 [144 0 R 288 0 R 146 0 R 147 0 R 148 0 R 149 0 R 150 0 R 151 0 R 289 0 R 153 0 R] /Type /StructElem endobj /P 10 0 R >> 72 41 /Pg 28 0 R /S /P /Resources 353 0 R << /Pg 18 0 R /Type /StructElem 0000000616 00000 n /S /P 17 [192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R 195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R] /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem endobj << 136 0 obj <>stream /K [16] endobj /S /P /S /P /K [5] 1 [270 0 R 271 0 R 272 0 R 273 0 R 274 0 R 275 0 R 276 0 R 277 0 R 278 0 R 279 0 R 281 0 obj >> /P 479 0 R /Type /StructElem >> /Pg 34 0 R endobj 686 0 obj <>stream /Type /StructElem /Tabs /S << 76 0 obj << /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Type /StructElem 225 0 obj /K [10] 15 [170 0 R 171 0 R 172 0 R 173 0 R 174 0 R 291 0 R 176 0 R 177 0 R] 266 0 obj Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select, https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/Ia9defb5505ba11ecbea4f0dc9fb69570/Interrogatories-Responding-to-Interrogatories-FL?viewType=FullText&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default), Interrogatories: Responding to Interrogatories (FL). /Type /StructElem << <>/Metadata 338 0 R/ViewerPreferences 339 0 R>> 219 0 obj endobj 216 0 obj /S /L << /P 10 0 R 103 0 obj 62 0 obj m8{3N? /Type /StructElem endobj << /P 10 0 R /Pg 26 0 R >> >> >> 206 0 obj /S /P << /P 10 0 R endobj >> << /Pg 13 0 R >> /Type /StructElem << /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /Type /Page /Type /StructElem When an answer to an interrogatory may be derived from records and the burden of deriving the information would be the same for either party, the party who received the interrogatory has the option to identify and produce or make available the records from which the answer may be derived. << 74 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R >> /Pg 20 0 R 140 0 obj /K [9] /Pg 30 0 R /P 472 0 R /Pg 24 0 R /Pg 19 0 R endobj 175 0 R 176 0 R 177 0 R 178 0 R 179 0 R 180 0 R 181 0 R 182 0 R 183 0 R 184 0 R /Type /StructElem /Group 324 0 R 199 0 obj >> 61 0 obj /K [11] endobj /P 10 0 R endobj ) ) ) ) defendants. ) << /Type /StructElem /S /LBody << /K [468 0 R] >> 313 0 obj >> /P 10 0 R endobj 195 0 obj /Type /StructElem /S /P << /S /P 12 0 obj /K [6] /Pg 32 0 R 37 0 obj /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /S /L /P 473 0 R P. 1.340(c). /K [34] 145 0 R 146 0 R 147 0 R 148 0 R 149 0 R 150 0 R 151 0 R 152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R /Pg 19 0 R 261 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj << /Type /StructElem This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. >> /Parent 6 0 R >> /P 10 0 R /K [15] /S /P endobj /Type /StructElem /S /P endobj >> /P 10 0 R 280 0 R 281 0 R 282 0 R 43 0 R] /Footer /Sect /Pg 34 0 R >> /Slide /Part <> /Type /StructElem << >> 0000051314 00000 n 162 0 obj endobj /P 10 0 R endobj << 212 0 obj endobj /P 473 0 R /Pg 17 0 R << >> /S /P /Type /Page /P 472 0 R /S /P 11 [131 0 R 132 0 R 133 0 R 134 0 R] /Type /StructElem /K [13] <> >> /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 34 0 R /Pg 20 0 R /Annots [] endobj /P 321 0 R Airport, 278 F.R.D. /Pg 18 0 R /S /P /K [2] /Pg 31 0 R /S /P endobj /Pg 34 0 R 5 [86 0 R 87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R /Annots [434 0 R 435 0 R 436 0 R] /Type /StructElem 224 0 obj 308 0 obj /Type /StructElem /S /LBody >> endobj %%EOF But if are a plaintiff's lawyer, you must know this rule. /Pg 14 0 R endobj endobj /Pg 13 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] %%EOF /Type /StructElem >> 169 0 obj >> << Fla. R. Civ. /P 10 0 R /Resources 378 0 R /K [3] /Pg 21 0 R 0000002293 00000 n /Parent 6 0 R >> /K [9] endobj /S /L << /Type /Page /Pg 33 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /P endobj /Pg 24 0 R >> /Dialogsheet /Part /S /P /K [2] /P 10 0 R << endobj Social media evidence is generally discoverable, not subject to privilege and not protected by a right to privacy. 318 0 obj endobj endobj /K [11] /Names [(Note 1) 35 0 R (Note 2) 36 0 R] /Pg 26 0 R Carefully crafted interrogatories and requests for production may make it more difficult for plaintiffs to prevent the discovery of social media information and more likely that defense attorneys are provided access to information that initiates a favorable resolution of their clients cases. /S /P /Parent 6 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj << endobj /Pg 18 0 R >> /K [2] This Standard Document has integrated notes with important explanations on how to draft common interrogatories used in Florida litigation and the usual defined terms and instructions. 127 0 obj /Pg 27 0 R /Type /StructElem 71 0 obj << 0000000016 00000 n P. 1.280(b); Fla. R. Civ. >> /P 10 0 R /S /P /K [5] endobj endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /K [8] /Type /Page 130 0 obj /Pg 28 0 R 320 0 R 225 0 R 226 0 R 227 0 R 228 0 R 229 0 R 230 0 R 231 0 R 232 0 R 233 0 R] << /P 10 0 R >> /K [4] /Parent 6 0 R /Pg 26 0 R /Contents [430 0 R 431 0 R 432 0 R] endobj 0000002210 00000 n << /Source (WeJXFxNO4fJduyUMetTcP9+oaONfINN4+d7N38LePWQR8EmtF1G6bMwxLnhv5WNPB9khgm8VtCFmyd8gIrwOjQRAIjPsWhM4vgMCV8KvVF/K8leW6+gzDazQXX6SMk83Uf9DFsd34DM3GEg=) /Contents [340 0 R 341 0 R 342 0 R] /K [3] 143 0 obj /K [4] /K [2] /Pg 14 0 R /Contents [380 0 R 381 0 R 382 0 R] /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] Generalized assertions of privilege will be rejected. %PDF-1.7 /S /P endobj >> Northeast Florida State University from September 1999 to May 2003. P. 1.340 (a). endobj 6 [97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R 106 0 R endobj endobj /Type /StructElem >> /K [284 0 R 285 0 R] /S /P /S /P >> /Contents [350 0 R 351 0 R 352 0 R] 1, March 2018, Responding to Social Media Discovery Objections. P. 1.340 (a). 1 0 obj The plaintiff argued such access was overbroad and would violate her right to privacy. endobj /K [35] /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /S /P /P 10 0 R 107 0 obj >> >> /Parent 6 0 R Fla. R. Civ. /Pg 22 0 R /Type /StructElem /Group 394 0 R endobj Rule 1.340 (a) provides the following with regard to the timing for submitting and responding to interrogatories. 319 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Type /StructElem /S /P << >> 0000003287 00000 n endobj >> << >> 86 0 obj /K [458 0 R] 161 0 obj /Parent 6 0 R /K [13] >> >> endobj endobj /P 456 0 R /K [4] /Pg 23 0 R << Notably, the Fourth District held that, generally, photographs on a social networking site are not privileged, nor are they protected by any right of privacy, regardless of the privacy settings a user elects to establish on their account. /Pg 13 0 R /K [13] endobj >> |WxE*V M*Sh%F^erXXB*COS`"Lu /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /P << /P 10 0 R 150 0 obj /Type /StructElem /P 476 0 R << endobj /S /P /Pg 29 0 R 0000173956 00000 n /Filter /FlateDecode /Contents [335 0 R 336 0 R 337 0 R] /K [33] /Parent 6 0 R /Pg 20 0 R << /S /P /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R endobj /Parent 6 0 R endstream /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Group 339 0 R /K [11] /S /P 215 0 R 216 0 R 217 0 R 218 0 R 219 0 R 220 0 R 221 0 R 222 0 R 223 0 R 224 0 R >> >> /Type /StructElem /S /P /ID [<35422D32342D38432D41352D35462D31>] >> endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /S /P /S /P /Pg 13 0 R endobj /P 10 0 R >> /Type /StructElem >> << /Type /StructElem /Parent 6 0 R << << /Type /StructElem /Group 399 0 R endobj This website uses Google Translate, a free service. << 125 0 R 126 0 R 127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R 132 0 R 133 0 R 134 0 R >> /S /P /K [2] << endobj << endobj endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem endobj << Notice of Removal in the United States District Courts At A Glance, Case Management Statement in the United States District CourtAt A Glance. << /S /Span /Type /StructElem 77 0 obj /Pg 17 0 R >> /Group 384 0 R endobj /K [3] endobj endobj >> /P 10 0 R /ModDate (D:20190506133758-04'00') >> endobj /Pg 29 0 R /S /P >> >> /K [480 0 R 302 0 R] as well as their objections and responses to discovery requests, are subject to Fla. Stat. /S /P /K [3] << /Pg 14 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R << >> /Type /StructElem endobj /Contents [420 0 R 421 0 R 422 0 R] 108 0 obj /S /P /Pg 27 0 R 67 0 obj endobj /S /P /K [20] /Pg 13 0 R /Type /Page 176 0 obj /K [10] endobj /Resources 333 0 R endstream /S /P >> << 291 0 obj 237 0 obj endobj << /K [7] A claim of privilege must be supported by a statement of particulars sufficient to enable the Court to assess its validity. endobj /K [4] /K [11] 326 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem endobj /P 10 0 R FORM INTERROGATORY NO. /Pg 27 0 R endobj /StructParents 13 >> << /Group 329 0 R /P 10 0 R << /Type /StructElem endobj /P 10 0 R /K [6] << endobj /K [4] /P 464 0 R /K [0] /Resources 343 0 R /S /P 236 0 obj << /Type /StructElem /K [5] /K [8] Specific objections should be matched to specific interrogatories. /K [3] /Tabs /S /Type /StructElem /Tabs /S 221 0 obj 0000053149 00000 n Despite its ubiquity, many peopleincluding plaintiffs in personal injury lawsuitscontinue to share information on their social media accounts that can be a boon to defense counsel but disastrous to their own claims.
How Does Internet Censorship Affect Intelligence Agencies,
Betway Registration Swaziland,
Land For Sale In Retreat, St Thomas Jamaica,
Articles S